Armand1@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Lets not link BBC articles about trans topics. They are famously terrible at properly covering them.
For example, calling Sex Matters a charity and not a hate group is a big mischaracterization.
Armand1@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Lets not link BBC articles about trans topics. They are famously terrible at properly covering them.
For example, calling Sex Matters a charity and not a hate group is a big mischaracterization.
TRAHR@quokk.au 3 days ago
There is no ‘better’ source for this news, the alternative is to never know it is happening.
Armand1@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Well, this one is good.
leighday.co.uk/…/trans-led-group-granted-permissi…
Though you could say it’s a followup.
It mentions that Translucent have come to help weigh in, and that 86% of respondents voted to keep it inclusive from back in January, which is covered here:
theguardian.com/…/hampstead-heath-ponds-trans-inc…
TRAHR@quokk.au 3 days ago
Okay I’ve changed it to that, although it’s a much worse title as it implies some sort of positive event rather than highlighting the injustice.
Armand1@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Thanks friend. I expect you’ll get more traction too.
Blibittyblah@futurology.today 3 days ago
That’s what the user above would prefer. Quietly silencing things by shaming posting major networks. Sounds like a trick.
People can choose not to click a BBC link.
Armand1@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Says the bot with a 9 day old account and hundreds of comments 😄
Blibittyblah@futurology.today 3 days ago
The trick to knowing when you’re on the right track is when they complain about arbitrary things like account age.