By definition it’s less dangerous.
One involves the violence, one is the planning of the violence (with no actual violence having happened).
It implies multiple parties and the intent to commit the violence in the future, but the violence hasn’t happened yet.
If they were the same ting there wouldn’t be a separate term and or crime.
It sounds like you want to argue that the planning (with intent) should carry the same sentence and repercussions, which is an entirely valid argument, have at it.
Pretending that planning and execution are the same exact level of danger serves only to undermine what might otherwise be a well reasoned argument.
Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Sure. There’s a lot of context to consider here, but seems you comprehension is quite limited.
mlcgdrhu@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Not really. You’ve overcomplicated the topic.