Comment

Comment on BBC to force more to pay licence fee with ‘YouTube tax’

It’s very specifically about what an individual does and does not wish to watch, because it only applies in certain circumstances. If it wasn’t about that, everyone would have to pay it regardless of usage.

Much like car tax is about whether or not a person drives a car.

source

Sort:hotnew top

northernscrub@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
I wasn’t referring to road tax, I was referring to income tax. just because I drive a car, I cannot (and should not) be able to reclaim the proportion of tax I pay that is put towards public transport infrastructure.

source
- Senal@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  
  then you’re funding a valuable public service to others, that provides not only the news, weather, and eastenders, but also a host of revision tooling for students of all ages, language services, a public information broadcast point in case of national disaster, and so on. It’s not just about you and what you do or do not wish to watch. If you drive a car, a portion of the tax you pay still goes towards public transport services.
  
  Genuine question, which part of this is referring to income tax?
  
  The only tax reference i’m seeing is the one that specifically prefaces it with “if you drive a car”.
  
  Another genuine question, i’m not seeing how
  
  just because I drive a car, I cannot (and should not) be able to reclaim the proportion of tax I pay that is put towards public transport infrastructure.
  
  Relates to anything in my reply.
  
  Not looking for a fight , it seems i’m legitimately missing something important here.
  
  source