Comment on The Billionaires have spent a fortune making sure you hate Socialism.

<- View Parent
Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

Well, there’s also anarcho-capitalism, or minarchism

“Anarcho”-capitalism isn’t so much anarchism as it is a rebranding of feudalism. Anarchism is opposed to heirarchies, so it’s incompatible with capitalism. Minarchism is an unrealistic, idealist ideology. Whichever class wields power over the state is going to use the state to advance their interests.

This general position against “the rich” is also slightly biased, but completely understandable given the current events.

It’s just that revenge taxing the rich will essentially accomplish nothing beyond satisfying the egos of a few people.

It’s not biased, and it’s not “revenge.” The rich are a class, which is engaged in class warfare against the poor. Weakening them would be worthwhile even if we didn’t get a direct benefit from it, because the fewer resources they have the less ability they have to impose worse conditions, and vise versa.

Now, are you going to ask the government to help you out, when they are essentially the enemy?

An anarchist might oppose taxing taxing the rich for that reason.

I would argue that the government is merely a tool, that can be used by different classes for different purposes. It is not the primary enemy, which is the rich, but the tool is often used by the rich to advance their interests. Imposing taxes on the rich would be an example of the working class wielding the tool of the government against the rich.

I care about addressing the real problems, the core issues. For example, the fact that the rich and the powerful seem to be above the law.

That’s what you just called a “pointless issue,” isn’t it? When we discuss politics, aren’t we discussing strategies for addressing the power of the rich? Is it pointless to discuss those strategies?

source
Sort:hotnewtop