Comment on Jury unanimously acquits Churchill statue spray-painter
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 weeks agoUniversity of Birmingham disagrees: academic.oup.com/ojls/article/45/2/329/8078322?lo… they say that it should be a legal defence.
Comment on Jury unanimously acquits Churchill statue spray-painter
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 weeks agoUniversity of Birmingham disagrees: academic.oup.com/ojls/article/45/2/329/8078322?lo… they say that it should be a legal defence.
FishFace@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
They’re welcome to say that. I’ll stick with my own beliefs and those of the judge in this case though, after a brief read of some of that long paper. You’re welcome to make the case, though.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m sorry. You’re beliefs don’t matter. Only facts.
FishFace@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Like the fact that the article linked does not represent the law in the UK at the moment?
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The Jury is law and the Jury decided Olax Outis did nothing wrong. Maybe the judge shouldn’t have disrespected the Jury? Maybe they decided that, given the context, it was more important that voices against genocide not be silenced?