No- I said that this protest literally will not make a single change happen, because they didn’t do any lasting damage to the corp, their finances, or their leadership.
My man literally said "oh yeah? You firebombed a Walmart huh, but you didn’t also use mortars or explosives so this isn’t good enough for my taste. "
supernight52@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Thisiswritteningerman@midwest.social 1 day ago
To be fair That’s the headquarters. Actual manufacturing sites are completely unharmed by this. All they’ve done is damage some show models in the atrium of the headquarters and maybe spooked some suits.
If you want to make a difference, honestly crippling cloud service facilities and directly targeting Microsoft server farms is a better bet. No idea which one, so targeting fanuc data directly isn’t easy, but even crippling teams and outlook stopped work for a day when a storm knocked out power to Microsoft site in Colorado that. Pretty sure it was a mass reported issue, so not just my corporation impacted.
Or, if you wanna hit a manufacturing site, some maps snooping (our various other sites aren’t a secret. What they all do isn’t public knowledge but their existence isn’t) or poke about the offices at headquarters. Know how many processes maps and diagrams around our local plant have suppliers and sub assembly process sites for easy explanation to managers?
Malica@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
Crazy security at data centers
TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Yeah… Not sure why you would attack the display models at a headquarters if you are willing to do the crime and the time? Prob would have done more functional damage to productivity if they just destroyed the desktops, filing cabinets, and supply closet.
While I appreciate the sentiment, I’m not sure if that’s something I’d be happy catching trumped up terrorism charges over.
NewDark@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Appreciate the context, that makes a lot more sense now.