Comment

Comment on What is an average person living in the US supposed to do about corporations raising prices?

I don’t think that’s the initial point of OP.

The point is that quality of life and real income are in strong decline, and it doesn’t seem like it will get better.

Sure, there are easy methods to cut expenses or even make some beer money, but a)many have already implemented it, and b)everyone already could.

The question can be formulated as “how can we improve the living situation for everybody?”. So that you wouldn’t need to figure out how to live cheaper or get some side hustle as you see your income shrinks.

source

Sort:hotnew top

DadVolante@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Yeah, lots of people in here saying “stop supporting corporations” as if it is not only easy, but simple to do.

Wanna cook whole foods? You growing your own or buying them from the Amish?

Wanna fix your own house (something I am currently doing), good luck finding a hardware/lumber supply that isn’t owned by one.

Want to use the internet?

It isn’t so simple. I think doing what you can with what you have is all anyone in the working class can really do. For some people it’s more, others less.

In the end, it seems like human history is a series of people with wealth and resources screwing over others, with brief bursts of progress.

Ugj.

source
- Allero@lemmy.today ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  The point is, the change needs to be systemic, not just us choosing not to use corpo’s products. It’s impractical and often outright impossible, and personal choice never was the solution.
  
  Guess why there are all those financial gurus and politicians blaming people for “dumb spending”, “lazy working” or “not supporting the causes with their dollar”? Because they know full well it isn’t really feasible, but know this keeps us in the rat race while taking full blame upon ourselves rather than true villains.
  
  Corporations (and in my personal opinion, capitalism itself, because it’ll always try to find a loophole) should legally die or face very strong taxation and pushback. Stop supporting corporations on governmental level, and then we’ll have a bet.
  
  source
pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Honestly, if we all grew and shared our own food, that alone would be enough to turn the tide and improve our lives.

We could use the money we save from groceries and use it to buy land, and with that land take back economic power from corporations, politicians and the ruling class.

We could organize and pick representatives amongst us that aren’t part of either party to take local offices and use their powers to change zoning laws to enable more housing to be built, and to allocate funding for such, and to pass laws banning anyone other than primary residents from buying the properties.

Assuming you want to do it legally. Arguably one individual could accomplish a lot more with the proper use of a .50 cal.

source
- Allero@lemmy.today ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I’d argue you can’t outplay corporations in their own game. If you start saving on groceries and make it a trend, they’ll just find a way to cut your income once more. Because why paying so much if you can now get on with less?
  
  Besides, the sum saved from sharing food is not nearly enough to buy any significant amount of land anyway, and you also need all the machinery and equipment to make it work, and even then this entire thing should be set at an enormous scale to combat the scale benefit of existing corpos (which would be very tough considering such scaling will cause immense oversaturation of the market and fierce price wars, to which independent businesses are not ready due to lack of reserves, i.e. corpos will just dump the price, see your community die off without money, and raise prices back up again the minute it happens.
  
  Local representatives could work, but first something needs to be done with human perception of independent parties.
  
  Honestly, .50 cal seems to be the most risky, violent, but most workable option. No wonder most such big changes were accompanied by bloody revolutions.
  
  source
  - pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    That’s not true, people have been making their own stuff for thousands of years before these corpos came up and we can do it again.
    
    And we can collectively set up our own we all own and that actually serve us, too.
    
    You just have to believe it’s possible, which it is. And you have to believe in yourself. If you think those are lies, your worldview is just negatively skewed. People can and do make change all of the fucking time. It’s time for our generation to be among them.
    
    source
    Allero@lemmy.today ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    For those thousands of year people lived in extreme poverty, because “just making stuff yourself” is actually extremely inefficient. There’s a reason industries started to centralize in the first place - the scale effect is huge, and we can’t expect to beat well-coordinated, cebtralized entities by just “doing stuff for ourselves”.
    
    We need to organize and unite, but as I said, in a capitalist competition, unless you accrue capital bigger than the corporations (which is, well, problematic), you’ll just die to a price war (unless you convince everyone to go starve).
    
    The only way is to change the system, to put already existing production capabilities to serve general population. This means strikes. This means protests. This means overthrowing the government if need be.
    
    We cannot move further in an existing frame, and “just believing your dream” won’t change objective economic issues discussed in every economy 101.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments