Comment on Saw this at the store this morning, took a double take
Fawkes@lemmy.zip 23 hours agoBelow drinking age, sure. I think the nonsense here is that the US considers you “Under age” until you’re 21. So you’re complaining about an ad targeting children, when the target is literally “Anybody under the age of 21.” Which is an unfair complaint to make.
Because using that same logic, “under age” porn is actually legal. Because at 18 you can get fucked in the ass by 3 dudes at once, but not buy a beer.
I hear you say “But there are different ages for X and Y.” Yeah, but it’s the exact same term used to mean the same idea with completely different ranges and neither has any justification beyond “Uh… Here’s the cut-off I guess?”
Would you take issue with 18yr olds having beer ads aimed at them? Because that’s technically “Under Age Beer!” And they’d be considered full adults here in Germany.
creamfresh@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Yes I take issue with alcohol ads aimed at anybody.
Fawkes@lemmy.zip 18 hours ago
Sure, I’m not against that at all. I hate advertisements and would take no issue with a universal ban. My problem was with the arbitrary moral outrage at this advertisement targeting “Children,” by virtue of the utterly meaningless phrase “Under Age,” which includes actual, legitimate adults, in the US.
creamfresh@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
It‘s pushing the boundaries with the emphasis (UNDER AGE) but I’m with you.
Fawkes@lemmy.zip 6 hours ago
Only because the boundary has been set to include genuine adults. That boundary SHOULD be pushed.