Comment on Why Max Decided to Lose ‘HBO’ in Its Name

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

oh my GOD do people actually buy this shit that corpos spew? I’m going to copy these paragraphs here for everyone to really read:

WSJ: HBO has been an iconic brand for decades. How did the company come to the decision to move away from including it in the name of its streaming platform?

Spagnoletto: HBO is an iconic brand that stands for premium quality content, with stories that are world-renowned, from “The Sopranos” to “House of the Dragon.” The equity of that brand served very well when the company launched HBO Max.

The decision actually became a pretty simple one. Do you kill “HBO Max” or do you kill “HBO”? Because you can’t have both. You can’t have “HBO” in the name and then put this incredibly varied library under it and expect consumers to have the same equity in the brand.

WSJ: So HBO lives on underneath the Max name as a brand.

Spagnoletto: The analogy I like to use is that of a mosaic. A mosaic has made many tiles that—put together—have this bigger image. The new mosaic is Max. Under that, one of the big tiles is HBO, but it’s not the only tile. We had to make room for Warner Bros. theatrical, the Discovery shows, news and sports.

Okay, so first thanks for reading it. Some key translations from corpo marketing bullshit speak to plain English:

Seriously, does anyone believe the marketing doublespeak anymore? (Sadly I know, most do)

source
Sort:hotnewtop