Trump was on the outs with Epstein for a very long time and informed the FBI on him. But I am sure you were one of the dopes who was posting “There are 43,284 references to Trump in the Epstein files…!” but it’s literally just every email ever talking about politics.
The sexual abuse allegations concerning E. Jean Carroll were so absurd that Trump famously made a studio audience laugh uncontrollably while denying them, exposig the absurdity of it.
Terrific video from 2023 on YT.
It was a completely manufactured story - I really appreciate this walk down memory lane.
In the meantime I’ll continue ignoring the small time “journalism” you post regarding issues that aren’t even real issues because you desperately need to draw attention away from the failure criminal you’ve chosen to support.
Be my guest.
It’s a free country.
Let’s enjoy posting our own material for our own audiences, and I am more than happy to have a debate on the side here or there.
DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Over 38,000. And that’s just in the fraction of heavily redacted files the public has been given access to.
en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_people_named_in_the_Ep…
Here’s Trump’s “wonderful secret” birthday message to his best bud Jeffrey Epstein. Creepy AS FUCK coming from a guy that openly admitted to entering underage girl’s dressing rooms.
“I’ll go backstage before a show, and everyone’s getting dressed and ready and everything else. …You know, no men are anywhere. And I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant. And therefore I’m inspecting it. … Is everyone OK? You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.”
I’ll repeat. I do not care about your worthless opinions concerning the law. The law is the law. It determined he is a rapist and made him pay for it. Is it that surprising considering his 2016 campaign for president included the recording of him admitting he sexually assaults women by grabbing them by the pussy because he can get away with it because he’s famous? Just locker room talk though, right? Yeah, a locker room full of rapists.
Yeah, there’s a lot of videos of Donald Trump making a room full of dipshit bigots laugh. That’s nothing new. He’s been doing that in rooms full of idiots for years. He’s known for surrounding himself with sycophants that would let him fuck their wives (or children).
Translation: “I have a safe space and I don’t feel comfortable leaving it.”
Sorry bud. I didn’t come looking for you. This drivel showed up while I was scrolling.
Face it. You support a criminal pervert, but your pride prevents you from acknowledging that, so you double down instead. Excuse me, I need to go take a bleach shower after conversing with someone STILL defending this low IQ freak in the year of our lord 2026.
Lovstuhagen@hilariouschaos.com 1 day ago
First of all, thank you for citing your source.
Yeah, he’s talking to Howard Stern, famous for racy interviews, and he said something stupid. But what I am imagining is a guy walking about, there is a commotion, and he is looking in on a group of women generally in their underwear, not unlike the swimwear they will be wearing on stage later, and the bulk of the women have already signed up to walk around half-naked in front of a large audience, even a large televised audience.
This isn’t exactly a 1:1 with charging into the girl’s volleyball team’s locker room unannounced.
It is someone saying something stupid on Howard Stern? Naturally, lol. But this is just like what you do with the grab them by the pussy comment.
Trump was clearly describing the willingness of women to sleep with wealthy celebrities. The thrust of the whole quote is
Grabbing them by the pussy is a comical, hyperbolic way of describing the willingness of women to be sexual with billionaire celebrities.
Do you dispute the fact that women are like that? It’s not unlike how many men who are not single will, in the perfect sitting, make out with a strange woman who isn’t even particularly attractive if she makes a move, let alone a gorgeous woman.
The judge allowed virtually any ridiculous thing as evidence against Trump while drastically limited the ability of Trump to respond. He was found guilty of something else - as AI states:
What does ‘liable’ mean here?
And what are the civil lawsuit standards for being liable for sexual assault in the state of New York?
So a judge constructed a scenario where New York liberals were able to state they thought he did it in a venue that does not carry the weight of a criminal trial, because there is no way that could have ever gone to trial.
The context is more that I do not particularly want to keep up the interaction.
Feel free to post right here, though of course turning the conservatives forum into a series of OPs bashing conservatives wouldn’t be acceptable, we do believe in free speech generally and so showing up to debate is more than welcome.
Sub & come again my man.