Bad tenants and people who want to rent exist, but the rest I don’t agree with
Comment on *landbastard intensifies at the right of replacing a 2 dollar light switch".
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago100% they’re bad tenants. They’re also people who never want to own, they’re people that will never be able to afford to own. There will always be a need for land lords
sukhmel@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Nah that’s stupid. Why do you presume to know that there will “always” be a need for landlords? People thought there would always be kings until democracy developed, people thought there would always nobility until capitalism emerged and rendered the land-based social relationships that defined feudal nobility meaningless. You lack imagination.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Ok, in our life times we will always need landlords. I know future generations could have a different setup. We can’t product the future. Maybe AI will lead to government built housing and UBI. We don’t know.
gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Are you 80? I absolutely plan on living past the end of (at least most) landlordism.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
I think you don’t realize how slow it will be to get to that point. I am a land lord, what’s the government going to do, take my land and property?
Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Well… No? You’re assuming a system where you have to pay for housing.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Which is essentially every where, that’s life.
Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Sure, under our current system. But you said there will always be a need for landlords, which I take issue with. But housing doesn’t have to operate the way it does now. There’s a variety of ways to pay for people to have housing under a money-based system, like through taxes. The soviet union had housing cooperatives. Hell, you don’t even need to go that far, housing prices are currently so high because we allow massive real estate corporations to buy up property to artificially inflate price. Government regulation on real estate as an industry would serve to lower housing prices. At the very least, make it so they can’t just sit on vacant homes.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
But that’s IF the government would build said housing. Or it takes it away from owners which is fucked. I’m all for government owned housing if they will build it and maintain it. It could lower housing prices and rents, your right if they build enough of them where needed
seblin@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Only within a relatively recent stretch of history, before that you only needed to pay for fancy stuff (think pyramids or castles or whatnot)
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Pay with money? No. But with blood when someone 3lse decides they would like your home.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
You can say that about a lot of things, matter of fact now, you have to pay for housing, there is no fantasy land where you don’t and won’t in our life time