Comment on *landbastard intensifies at the right of replacing a 2 dollar light switch".

• gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  There are no “bad tenants”, because that would imply inconveniencing landlords and costing them money is morally wrong. It’s not, it’s funny as hell😭

  source

  • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    100% they’re bad tenants. They’re also people who never want to own, they’re people that will never be able to afford to own. There will always be a need for land lords

    source

    • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Well… No? You’re assuming a system where you have to pay for housing.

      source

      • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Which is essentially every where, that’s life.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • sukhmel@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Bad tenants and people who want to rent exist, but the rest I don’t agree with

      source
    • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Nah that’s stupid. Why do you presume to know that there will “always” be a need for landlords? People thought there would always be kings until democracy developed, people thought there would always nobility until capitalism emerged and rendered the land-based social relationships that defined feudal nobility meaningless. You lack imagination.

      source

      • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Ok, in our life times we will always need landlords. I know future generations could have a different setup. We can’t product the future. Maybe AI will lead to government built housing and UBI. We don’t know.

        source

        • -> View More Comments