Comment

not all AIs are LLMs

Pray tell what AI isn’t trained on ❝large contested data❞

LLMs are what y’all are hating)

🧵, blatantly. But asset diffusers from stolen assets are also highly discouraged, as they are illegal, and it demonstrated the planet the two classes than ever before: corporate power can lobby copyright infringement, while everyone else cannot. Many hate it for quality reasons. I hate it because it’s fascism in its purest form: appropriating assets without consent.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

Pray tell what AI isn’t trained on ❝large contested data❞

Search Engines (no, i don’t mean that bullshit google did, i mean any search engine before 2020), reccomendation systems(many other algorithms too), language translation (again, the ones before 2020 not the LLM based ones that google and deepl use right now), OCR, etc etc

source
- rursta@retrolemmy.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  
  Search Engine([…]i mean any search engine before 2020), reccomendation systems(many other algorithms too), OCR,
  
  … how do you think these aggregating sorters are trained? OCR you shot your own argument.
  
  train them with data collected legally
  
  fascists are already colluding to make their breaches legal.
  
  source
  - Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    
    Fascists are already colluding to make their breaches legal.
    
    Well, i mean, legal like before the fascist scum tried to make the illegal legal
    
    source
    rursta@retrolemmy.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    sure.
    But be aware crawlers (search engines), OCR, and even suggestions sorters are trained on data, especially adversarially. Some infringing IP, some self-generated.
    OP got smacked for using a LLM, when e could have hired localizers, even 🧵.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments