All LLMs are AIs but not all AIs are LLMs (and LLMs are what 6call are hating)
Comment on [deleted]
rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 weeks agowhat in blazes do you think is a «large language model»?
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 weeks ago
not all AIs are LLMs
Pray tell what AI isn’t trained on ❝large contested data❞
LLMs are what y’all are hating)
🧵, blatantly. But asset diffusers from stolen assets are also highly discouraged, as they are illegal, and it demonstrated the planet the two classes than ever before: corporate power can lobby copyright infringement, while everyone else cannot. Many hate it for quality reasons. I hate it because it’s fascism in its purest form: appropriating assets without consent.
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
Pray tell what AI isn’t trained on ❝large contested data❞
Search Engines (no, i don’t mean that bullshit google did, i mean any search engine before 2020), reccomendation systems(many other algorithms too), language translation (again, the ones before 2020 not the LLM based ones that google and deepl use right now), OCR, etc etc
rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 weeks ago
Search Engine([…]i mean any search engine before 2020), reccomendation systems(many other algorithms too), OCR,
… how do you think these aggregating sorters are trained? OCR you shot your own argument.
train them with data collected legally
fascists are already colluding to make their breaches legal.
Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Deepl was around way before LLMs. It was still made with neutral networks trained on research papers and the like but it couldn’t be communicated with or generate stuff for you. So u can see why axolotl thought that it didn’t use LLMs. However it seems to nowadays use LLMs
rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 weeks ago
…
What makes one think NNs are not LLMs?
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
LLMs are NNs for whoever is wondering btw
Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
LLMs are neutral networks but not all neural networks are LLMs