Comment on Would it be better to just have a lot of society be underground?

<- View Parent
grue@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

Consider the following scenarios:

  1. You start with a hill, then dig down into it and build a building such that it has a flat green (vegetated) roof at the original ground level.

  2. You start with flat ground, build the same building on top of it, then mound dirt up around the sides to form a hill.

Two methods to the same result, right?

But now, imagine that instead of one building, you’ve got an entire city worth of buildings like that bunched up touching each other (no roads between them, just interior corridors). With scenario #1, you’ve still got to do a bunch of excavation for each and every building. But with scenario #2, you only need to do earth-moving around the perimeter of the city (if you even bother). Still the same result, but now method #2 is much, much cheaper.

I’m looking out over the Tokyo skyline right now and there’s every level of building. How do you get everyone to agree on the one right height?

This is a very hypothetical thread, so that’s the kind of issue that could just be hand-waved away as part of the initial premise. But if you want a real answer, that’s easy: “zoning codes.” Cities have absolutely no trouble exercising their authority to regulate building height.

source
Sort:hotnewtop