If it works out, the AI would produce more than it consumes.
Ah, yes, I’m sure AI is going to defy the first law of thermodynamics any day now.
Sure in a couple hundred years, and a dozen new paradigms down the road we might get somewhere that AI is nearly as efficient as a human brain. Generative AI of this generation isn’t going to do that, I’m pretty sure that’s obvious to everyone by now. We’re never going to live in a world without money, because the people with all the money are never going to allow that. You think they don’t realize they are mediocre in almost every facet of life than shaking hands and raping babies?
Who fills those committees, who appoints the boards? This is not made for us, this is made for them. It is not the tools that are the problem, its who those tools are designed to benefit. Because it isn’t the people being forced to use them to eat.
howrar@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Humans as a whole already produce way than we consume. Why should it not be possible for robots to do the same?
And you know that it only happens because people put the work in to make it happen, right?
Regarding the rest of your post, I choose to believe that we can change the world for the better. I’m very aware that the current system has problems. I don’t know if you’re just looking to complain or if you have solutions to propose. I was kind of hoping for the latter because I don’t have any ideas so far.
GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Order of operations. You cannot produce ethical systems in a socioeconomic system that will only reward unethical outcomes. Trying to build ethical AI models under the current social conditions is only handing the most powerful tools ever built by human hands to people who will use it to hurt everyone else on the planet.
To use an analogy, the is no world in which unlocking nuclear fusion in Hitler’s German ends well for mankind.