Comment on This Apple Lie at the grocery store
consumptionone@lemmy.world 9 hours agoWhy are you moving the goalposts? In your first post the goal was without further deforestation of rainforests, but in your reply, you changed the goal to without environmental impact. As long as global population growth is a thing, the former is possible, the latter not so much.
I’ll admit I’m not terribly interested in this topic. I only replied to your comment (at the same time as another commenter making a similar argument) because you come off as a shill for palm oil, which is odd.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
I’m not trying to write a thesis and pick exact words here. Let me move the goalposts back.
Where do you suggest to find 500M acres without deforesting something and driving a few more species extinct?
DaleGribble88@programming.dev 9 hours ago
Just because a random Internet stranger doesn’t know a better solution off the top of their head, doesn’t mean that there isn’t a problem to be clearly seen.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
I’m not arguing there isn’t a problem, I’m pointing out the stupidity in advocating for an even worse solution.