Comment on Royal Family to get a 94% surge in taxpayer-funded income whilst 'it's subjects' must expect less
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 week agoHow much of those rent increases are because of Truss as you are using a 5 year period? Mortgage rates are a pretty big contributor to rent rates and they are getting cheaper compared to 3 years ago.
I don’t know about you, but for us food/energy is pocket change compared to housing. So even if they have increased 40% that makes fuck all difference compared to the reduced mortgage.
tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 1 week ago
It’s not “pocket change”. For most households in UK, food, energy and rent/mortgage take up about 70% of income. That doesn’t include anything else or other bills (or alcohol or going out or clothing etc). For a lower-earning familiy it takes up considerably more than that.
Truss’ budget accelerated for a short-term period what was happening to the economy (and mortgages). Economists believe that the rises would have happened anyway. If mortgages are going DOWN why are rents going UP?
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
Did you actually read what I said? Put it another way, if rent is 55% of income and energy+food is 15%, the problem really is rent, not food/energy.
tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 6 days ago
By focusing on mortgages (which is how you started) you miss the extent of the problem. That’s why you feel that things for YOU aren’t that bad. It’s not true that 55% goes on rent/mortgage. The numbers are roughly 20% for households with mortgages, 35% for rent (slightly lower for social housing). Low-earners, as I said earlier, get hit the hardest and spend much more of their income on mortgages/rent. The problem is the perfect storm of food + energy + rent\motgage + taxation + low-levels of welfare support in UK.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
Wtf are you buying to eat if only 20% of your income goes on mortgage and 50% on food/energy?