Clarity. Personally we treat “open source” and “free software” (in the FOSS sense) as synonyms, and “free software” could easily be used (by someone who doesn’t know FOSS context) for something that’s just not paid.
So saying “open source” makes it clear that it’s /actually open source/ and not just “not paid”.
forestbeasts@pawb.social 1 week ago
Clarity. Personally we treat “open source” and “free software” (in the FOSS sense) as synonyms, and “free software” could easily be used (by someone who doesn’t know FOSS context) for something that’s just not paid.
So saying “open source” makes it clear that it’s /actually open source/ and not just “not paid”.
JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Say libre then.
forestbeasts@pawb.social 1 week ago
That makes sense for FOSSheads, but regular people might not get it!
(also fun bonus of calling stuff open source: it annoys the “permissive licenses aren’t REALLY FREE!!” people. :3)
JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Well they need to learn, and if they refuse, we put them in the FOSS reeducation camp!