Is it only me that just hates the idea of âmarkingâ someone up-front, rather than deriving what you think of them from their actions? My point being that the way we interpret things should be âthis thing is badâ -> âthe person is badâ, not the inverse âthis person is marked as badâ -> âthey said/did somethingâ -> âthat thing must be badâ.
I feel like an extension like this is built around facilitating the latter: Judging the content or actions based on whether the person is tagged as âgoodâ or âbadâ, rather than looking at the words and actions themselves.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works â¨16⊠â¨hours⊠ago
Iâma be real, itâs highly concerning to install something like that in the first place. I canât place my finger on it tho why.
Cause it sounds like a good idea on paper. But my brain keeps going to toxic positivity and that doesnât feel entirely right?