Comment on OnlyFans 'agents' control and threaten creators while taking half their earnings, BBC finds
Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 5 days agoDidn’t the article say that some of the protections OnlyFans have in place didn’t work? Like linking bank accounts with a different name.
OnlyFans can also easily warn content creators about scams.
paultimate14@lemmy.world 4 days ago
That’s kind of vague, but it seems like the BBC is just expecting some sort of magical, privacy-invading, AI facial scanning technology to happen. I would not expect a photo to be involved with any payment processing at all. If I sell something on eBay do I need a photo ID to get my money? If I sell anything anywhere else, or start my own business with my own website, or my friends and family just want to send me money, do I need to have a photo and facial recognition every time?
And OnlyFans points to their 3rd party payment processors. OnlyFans isn’t in the business of processing payments- that is outsourced like almost every other business does too. And there are perfectly legitimate reasons why a model might want those payments to go to someone else. There are legitimate agents and agencies.
Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 4 days ago
Doesn’t someone else having access to your account violate OnlyFans terms of service? If it does they can implement basic KYC protections.
Either way, I don’t think this is a unsolvable problem.