Yep. Like I said, just because jews are the beneficiaries of (this means the people who benefit from something) Israel’s jewish supremacist ideology, doesn’t mean they are the perpetrators of it (this means the people who are to blame for something).
I mean that’s kinda like arguing white people weren’t responsible for apartheid in South-Africa
Yes. Because that’s the correct take. Folks in Novosibirsk were not to blame for apartheid in South Africa. Most white south afrikaners were, and probably some of the natives played a role as well. Probably the Dutch and the English were to blame to a large extent. But whites as an ethnic group, as a whole? That’s just silly.
wpb@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yep. Like I said, just because jews are the beneficiaries of (this means the people who benefit from something) Israel’s jewish supremacist ideology, doesn’t mean they are the perpetrators of it (this means the people who are to blame for something).
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean that’s kinda like arguing white people weren’t responsible for apartheid in South-Africa, “just because they were the beneficiaries”.
It wasn’t exactly black people drawing up those segregation laws, was it?
wpb@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes. Because that’s the correct take. Folks in Novosibirsk were not to blame for apartheid in South Africa. Most white south afrikaners were, and probably some of the natives played a role as well. Probably the Dutch and the English were to blame to a large extent. But whites as an ethnic group, as a whole? That’s just silly.
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I didn’t say it was all white people everywhere, but it definitely wasn’t the black people doing apartheid either.