Although your claims might be true (we’ll see) they don’t address the argument you replied to which is that:
If you think that someone using AI is wrong because of the water or ecological impact then you should think much worse about people who chose to eat a meat burger instead of a vegetable one because the extra water usage and ecological impact are many many orders of magnitudes bigger than an AI prompt causes.
roux2scour@jlai.lu 1 week ago
As if meat industry where not also driven by stock manipulation, exploitation, destruction of natural habitat, to grow food for developped country consumers, when a lot people still don’t have safe access for food.
Meat delicious is based on personal taste. This argument is as valid as “using ai is so fun”, so argument rejected
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I think the people have spoken
roux2scour@jlai.lu 1 week ago
Image
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Needs more jpeg