Apparently? You keep making philosophical assertions.
You don’t get to assert your philosophical views and then say, “I’m not interested is discussing philosophy” to avoid examination and criticism of those views.
i know that any example I could give could be argued against, and I really don’t wanna dive into that because it has no end.
like I said, the only thing anyone knows for sure is that they’re experiencing something, call it consciousness or whatever. however, that is not a great example of fact vs fiction, and this isn’t a philosophy debate sub, so I tried to keep it simple.
there are better examples, but I’m just trying to explain a simple concept, not get into the bottomless argument of philosophical truth
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Apparently? You keep making philosophical assertions.
You don’t get to assert your philosophical views and then say, “I’m not interested is discussing philosophy” to avoid examination and criticism of those views.
BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
do you agree with my assertion that some things are objective facts and some are not?
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Yes.
I just think you’re being dismissive, while setting your own ideas as being apart from philosophy.
BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
i know that any example I could give could be argued against, and I really don’t wanna dive into that because it has no end.
like I said, the only thing anyone knows for sure is that they’re experiencing something, call it consciousness or whatever. however, that is not a great example of fact vs fiction, and this isn’t a philosophy debate sub, so I tried to keep it simple.
there are better examples, but I’m just trying to explain a simple concept, not get into the bottomless argument of philosophical truth