are you talking about real morals humans follow, or nonsense “morals” written in a religious text several thousand years ago?
Comment on what do you think about biocomputing?
Tree@lemmy.ca 3 hours agoshould we tho? i think morals should come before utlity. we should ask ourselves more if we should do smth rather than ask what it would grant us
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Why should your morality be more important then mine? Morality is a deeply personal thing and a thing of the times.
Until 150 years ago it was moral to enslave people of different colour.
In some parts of the world it is still moral to withhold marriage rights to same sex couples.
Tree@lemmy.ca 2 hours ago
tbh i don’t really believe in relative morality ,i believe in objective eternal one.
neatchee@piefed.social 2 hours ago
so do you believe everyone was immoral until 150 years ago (end of and tolerance for slavery) or do you believe we are immoral today for denying the right to own slaves (as allowed by religious texts)?
Tree@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
i think the quran doesn’t permit owning slaves no,not now not back then. so yeah everyone 150 years ago that supported human slavery(human is important word here) is immoral. i however do believe it was moral for king/prophet solomon to enslave demons by force as a personal grant from god.