Comment on Why does it feel like most art museums are for adults and most science museums are for kids?
flabberjabber@lemmy.world 1 day agoBut there’s a third option. There’s a difference between complete absence of this topic in the curriculum, and simplified versions of it that increase in difficulty with capability. Mirroring other stages of educational development.
At the moment there’s a complete absence. At least in any country I’m aware of. Until late high school level which is way too late.
Young kds understand hierarchies. Social hierarchies start to form on the first day of kindergarten.
Teaching an 8 year old that science research sits at the top of a pyramid and newspapers and TV sitd at the bottom, would be easy to grasp. There’s nothing stopping us removing the detail and teaching a simplified structure that can then be built upon in subsequent years.
AskewLord@piefed.social 1 day ago
you have never been around children, have you?
flabberjabber@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If kid is capable of understanding basic scientific method at 8 years old, they can understand the basic structure of a hierarchy.
“X is more important than Y”
“Why sir”
“Because X uses the scientific method like we discussed in class last week and Y does not”
“What’s the scientific method again sir”
repeats for retention
AskewLord@piefed.social 1 day ago
that’s not how kids work. nor do most people.
flabberjabber@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Okay. I don’t agree with you, but that’s fine. We can disagree.