Comment on .ml has got to be the only place on earth where I'd get downvoted for a comment like this
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 week agoHistorically, though, proletarian anarchists have largely joined with the Marxists in socialist states. Petite bourgeois and bourgeois anarchists often sided against the new socialist state, as it did not expand their freedoms but instead stripped them of their capital, while proletarian anarchists found massively improved quality of life. I think saying that socialist states were only mildly better is a huge disservice to countries that managed to double life expectancy, among other massive improvements.
MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
I’m not saying historically things weren’t better in some regards (the USSR is the only country I know of to jump from feudal to industrial in a single generation, and that’s huge), I’m saying that right now things would only be mildly better.
Realistically, if the US somehow had a socialist revolution tomorrow, and going to be siding with whoever wants to further the revolutionary project.
But that’s to say nothing about the many many proletarian anarchists in the Ukranian Free Territory, that certainly did not join with the Marxists after the revolution
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
China also leaped from a colonized agrarian country to industrialized in a single generation, and Vietnam/Laos/Korea (both sides) were all similarly rapid. Cuba went from a primarily slave colony to a socialist country extremely rapidly as well.
As for the US, I think the leap would be similarly rapid. So much of the modern US Empire’s problems are caused by the decay in capitalism due to imperialism. Getting high speed rail, solar, decolonizing the Americas, healthcare, etc. would all be massive.