The last part is exactly what they want you to think. It WAS meant to be sufficient, but that would have cost someone else, so they invented the idea of people taking care of themselves with the 401K invention. Now when your SS doesn't mean your needs, they can point and say, well, you should have saved up better.
There used to be company pensions too, but they've slowly eroded away as younger people entered their jobs. My job gave me the option years ago of keeping the pension going or converting it to a secondary 401k that would earn lots of money, promise. I said hell no, give me my pension.
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Social security literally just is collective retirement savings
folekaule@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Honest question: how is it different from de facto insurance when you don’t get to withdraw everything you put into it, or pass it down when you die? I would like to know where my understanding of it is incorrect.
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Insurance pays out a flat amount once, social security pays out constantly for the rest of your life. You absolutely can pass down any of the money you get from social security. You’re not guaranteed 100% of what you put into regular retirement accounts either, if the market crashes so does everything tied to it.
folekaule@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I see…I was thinking in terms of health insurance where you do get “payouts” regularly. I was unaware that you can pass down social security benefits (sorry from your spouse getting more benefits).
My understanding was you can’t take it now than X amount per month, so you can’t “take it with you”. Market fluctuation aside, my retirement savings (minus taxes) can go to my children as inheritance.
Thank you for the explanation.