Comment on Spooooookyyyyy Scaaaaaaaarrryyyy
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Lol @ the people propping up the system with “passive income” making accusations
Comment on Spooooookyyyyy Scaaaaaaaarrryyyy
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Lol @ the people propping up the system with “passive income” making accusations
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
No idea what that means
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
It means that between communism and capitalism there’s exactly one option that says being paid for labor someone else did is fine and one that doesn’t
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 weeks ago
… Both of them though?
One based on investments, the other based on being unable to work. From each according to their abilities and all that.
Not that it’s a bad thing. To some degree we already do it in most sane capitalist countries too.
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
“To each according to their need” doesn’t necessarily mean pay, you could just provide housing and food directly to people who can’t otherwise afford it. Passive income necessarily requires exploitation and accounts for neither need nor ability.
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Which one?