Comment on Spooooookyyyyy Scaaaaaaaarrryyyy
teslekova@sh.itjust.works 18 hours agoI would say it values anything that enables the growth of capital. That can include people. However, I do agree that it is inherently indifferent to human life.
Comment on Spooooookyyyyy Scaaaaaaaarrryyyy
teslekova@sh.itjust.works 18 hours agoI would say it values anything that enables the growth of capital. That can include people. However, I do agree that it is inherently indifferent to human life.
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 hours ago
I get where you’re coming from but I do feel the need to point out that you’re ascribing held values to an ideology. It’s not a person, it can’t value anything. As an ideology it is valuable to people whose values prioritize self-enablement at all costs.
teslekova@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
Interesting point. I think you’re right. It’s a system, not a sentient being, it can’t really have values. Thx for the interesting point.
SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
Always a pleasure when minds meet well uwu
xspurnx@slrpnk.net 6 hours ago
And now you two could consider why Marx called the Capital the Automatic Subject…