Comment on average twitter political discussion
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI used one of their many descriptors, you zeroed in on that one. All of the labels apply to this individual, that is the extent of the statement.
Comment on average twitter political discussion
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI used one of their many descriptors, you zeroed in on that one. All of the labels apply to this individual, that is the extent of the statement.
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You chose to list “trans” and “autistic” in a list of otherwise abhorrent behaviors/traits about Chris. Get real.
Leaving things borderline unambiguous like this is how transphobes speak. If you’re not, I don’t recommend mirroring them. 🤷🏼♀️
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You can choose the impact of the statement, I know it’s intent. As would any reasonable person.
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You’re ignoring context and nuance as a way to be offended. You’re the one that needs to get over yourself lmfao.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
And I wouldn’t recommend defending Chris chan who is a horrid person who uses their labels to attack others and to hide from repercussions.
It makes you look like a biggot.
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If you think identifying transphobia is to defend Chris, you’re the problem.
SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 3 weeks ago
Please explain why or how this identifying of transphobia is not directly an attempt to defend Chris, IN THIS CONTEXT, to someone who is autistic. Some people aren’t hardwired for policing language or having their language policed, and I think that you are using your best methods you know, but tone of a written message often comes across in whatever way is most convenient to a given reader, which is what I think might be some source of the problem. Could you format your statement that went along the lines of “don’t mirror transphobic language if you don’t want to appear transphobic” in a way that uses the words “should” and “if” in the same sentence? I find that such a structure often addresses matters of internal opinion without presenting an imposing presence to the conversation.
northface@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Nobody is defending Chris from what I’ve seen.
They’re merely pointing out that including “trans” in the list of negative traits about Chris makes OP appear transphobic.
Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hmmm, you’re presenting as autisphobic, this is problematic.
You just couldn’t type that out, could you? Too afraid of autism. Sad.