Comment on Hands-on with ChatGPT's powerful new image engine

Chronographs@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It doesn’t count if you were told first.
  Need to try again in double blind AB testing.

  source

  • AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • Steve@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s asking which one someone likes more, not which they think is AI. It’s a subtle but important distinction. For me it was a tossup. I picked the AI 3 to 2.

      In reality all the passages felt like over-written attempts to say something simple, as poetical as possible. I’ve never really liked that style of writing. I try to be much more direct.

      But generally, yah. That’s what I mean. You need that kind of test to know if you can tell something is AI or not.

      source
• Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  OK. What are the clues?

  source

  • Chronographs@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Mostly the art and the fonts if I had to guess? It was more of an uncanny valley visceral reaction though.

    source

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’ve been out of the design game for six years at this point. Given that I did broadsheet design and wince at most everything for both art and typographical choices, it wasn’t really the sort of thing that stood out to me. There is a lot of bad design being happily gobbled up … hell, I didn’t look at rave flyers in the '90s and think “this is great design,” but rather “how the hell did they have the budget for C2S in CMYK with spot fluorescent and a top coat?”

      source

      • Chronographs@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I didn’t say it was bad, per-say, I don’t know enough about design to judge that, it just immediately triggered the “this is ai” bell in my head when I looked at it.

        source

        • -> View More Comments