Comment on Lemmy.jpeg
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days agoNope! I’m an anti-imperialist communist that studies the world as it exists today. The global south is rapidly developing, boosted by trade and partnerships with China. Western imperialism brought stunted development to even negative development. Read the sources I linked.
Jmdatcs@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’m more knowledgeable about this that you could ever hope to be (do you see how statements like that aren’t even remotely convincing?). I’m well aware of the cherry picked information you use to support your delusion.
cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
If you’re so knowledgeable then why haven’t you shared any of that knowledge?
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
You certainly haven’t been able to demonstrate your theory here, and haven’t been able to disprove a single claim I’ve made.
Jmdatcs@lemmy.world 2 days ago
None of your circle jerk “theory” will change the fact that hundreds of millions of Chinese live in poverty to fuel the grotesquely lavish lifestyles of a few, and that those few are turning their exploitative efforts outward to accumulate even more wealth, while letting a little “trickle-down” to keep the plebs calm.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
The countryside isn’t the backbone of the Chinese economy, the industrial base is. Poverty in the countryside exists because it’s less developed in comparison to the rapidly improving urban areas, due to the explosion in industrial production. By and large, the Chinese working classes are paid better and better every year, as I have shown with hard data, and the rural/urban gap is diminishing year by year. Chinese citizens live off of their own labor, and their trade and mutual agreements with other global south countries results in win-win economic development.
Not a single thing you’ve presented proves otherwise. All you have is your word.