Comment on I'm locked out of my 6 year old Chipotle account because they now say my email address is invalid when I login. Here is me asking for their help:

• stom@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  A bunch of IF statements don’t qualify as an AI. That’s not how that works.

  source

  • force@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I don’t think you know what AI is. A bunch of if statements can, in fact, constitute an AI. You don’t know what you’re talking about, stop trying to pretend you do.

    AI is a broad concept, a pathfinding algorithm can be considered AI, a machine learning image generator can be considered AI, a shitty chatbot (like this one) can be considered AI. Reducing something to a stupid sentence like “just a bunch of if statements” to try to make it seem absurd is. I can reduce something like ChatGPT the same way and it’d be pretty much as accurate as your take.

    source

    • stom@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Selecting a canned-text response based on simple keywords is a long way from AI, and it’s foolish to equivocate the two of them.

      Also, chill tf out, and don’t be so aggressively presumptious. I have enough experience with the topics in question to point out how misleading this statement is.

      source

      • force@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I suppose you didn’t click the link I sent – either that, or you think you know better than some of the leading figures in the field of AI… it’s not “a long way from AI”, it IS AI in its design and its purpose. It’s misleading to assert that it isn’t AI because it doesn’t meet your arbitrary complexity standard.

        I doubt you have any relavant experience in AI research or engineering based off of how you treat the concept of AI and even programs in general here… boiling a program down to “just a series of if statements” is extremely naïve and is itself misleading, you can do that for anything, every program is ultimately just a bunch of if-else/goto and simple math operations. It’s just an attempt to conceptually reduce it so much that it seems absurd that it could be in the same category as more advanced AI.

        You confidently said something that is very blatantly ignorant of the subject of AI, I find it reasonable for me to assume that you had know idea what you were talking about.

        Also you misused “equivocate”… it’s not a word used to compare two things, it means using double speak/speaking evasively, “to equivocate the two [AI vs. chatbots]” doesn’t mean anything. Did you mean “equate”?

        source

        • -> View More Comments