A substance farmer?
Like someone who grows weed?
stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Above average that has to count for something right? … Until you remember that the literacy rate is only slightly higher than that and the average person is a substance farmer, you just better be proud of selection bias.
A substance farmer?
Like someone who grows weed?
Sounds right to me
sustenance*
Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Well they aren’t though, 345/1000 people having a worse score than you means there are 654/1000 people who have a better score.
Corollary, “IQ 100” is a moving target that gets regularly updated to the new average (which relatively speaking has been mostly climbing for decades).
stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 week ago
And you trust this to be an actual IQ test not some knock of data stealing site?
Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Well yeah kind of, except for the caveat that there are some things in those tests a website can’t really check. The tests are standardised and publicly available. There isn’t really any reason to not implement a (half-way) proper test, even if you are just harvesting data.