Since Mozilla actually didn’t and the post is based on a lie, I’ll say congratulations, your reaction is almost certainly what they were hoping for
Comment on Good luck figuring it out since it also doesn’t come with man pages
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
What if… hear me out… what if we remove the focus on gender altogether? What if we stop engendering things that don’t have genders? Like logos… and behavioral attributes…
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 5 hours ago
You don’t think people childishly over anthropomorphizes a lot these days?
Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 hours ago
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
axx@slrpnk.net 2 hours ago
It’s a mascot, not a logo. So it having a gender isn’t strange.
Also, since its pronouns are (quoting the announcement blog post) “he/him, they/them, she/her, and it” that is very open and not rather post-gender, in my opinion. The focus in the announcement is not on thee mascot’s gender in fact.