It’s a mascot, not a logo. So it having a gender isn’t strange.
Also, since its pronouns are (quoting the announcement blog post) “he/him, they/them, she/her, and it” that is very open and not rather post-gender, in my opinion. The focus in the announcement is not on thee mascot’s gender in fact.
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Since Mozilla actually didn’t and the post is based on a lie, I’ll say congratulations, your reaction is almost certainly what they were hoping for
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
You don’t think people childishly over anthropomorphizes a lot these days?
Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 weeks ago
[relevant smbc]
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Image
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I mean, if you can provide data which shows that anthropomorphisation - specifically the unwarranted attribution of gender to things which are genderless - is on the rise and can demonstrate, or even articulate what the real-world harm of this is, then maybe I will agree that ranting about it in response to a tweet from an anti-woke twitter user lying about it in order to stir up tired “culture war” arguments isn’t silly
Perhaps we should also rant about the erosion of male-dominated spaces into spaces which are “lame and gay”, given that there are now women who play Warhammer?
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Why would I have an issue with women playing warhammer?
I specifically think associating warhammer with specifically men or women is stupid.
The issue I have is everything being put one of two categories that are irrelevant.