Comment on Progress
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 4 weeks agoIt “works” in that we know what he meant, but it literally doesn’t work without the “a”.
Comment on Progress
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 4 weeks agoIt “works” in that we know what he meant, but it literally doesn’t work without the “a”.
Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
‘Man’ is often used in the same way as ‘mankind’ which is how I’ve usually seen the quote interpreted. Clearly the preposition ‘a’ makes a very big difference but it still makes sense.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Yes, which is why without the “a” doesn’t work. He wasn’t saying “A small step for mankind, one giant leap for mankind” because that’s nonsensical.
He was saying he (a man) was literally taking a step with his leg, but it was a figuratively large step for the species because of where/how he was taking that step.
athatet@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Yeah that’s why DIDN’T fucking say mankind TWICE. Fuckin chill!
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
It would be redundant and self-contradictory without the “a.” That’s why it doesn’t make sense without it.
You chill.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
“a” is an indefinite article, not a preposition. Prepositions are how a verb relates to an indirect object. “The bunny hopped over the fence, around a tree, and down a hole.” The italicized words in this sentence are prepositions. In, on, at, near, etc… You get the idea…
Anyway, the quote is kinda contradictory without the “a”. Is it a small step or a giant leap? Oh, it’s a giant leap for mankind, and a small step for a man. Makes so much sense now.
Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Thank you. I had a feeling I was wrong about that. Couldn’t even think of the word article though so I assumed maybe it was a weird kind of preposition.