Barbie was a money printer, they will keep doing that and it will keep working. And honestly the movie was great.
As much as it sucks I can’t imagine D&D was nearly as much of a money printer.
rigatti@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hasbro continuing to make shit decisions on behalf of WotC, the only sector of the company keeping it afloat.
corytheboyd@kbin.social 1 year ago
ThugJesus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Barbie is Mattel, not Hasbro.
corytheboyd@kbin.social 1 year ago
Fuck lol mixed up my board game doll companies lol
snor10@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I think Barbie would like a word
squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
That’s Mattel. And one of the reasons why Hasbro looks so bad in comparison.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s Mattel.
Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social 1 year ago
You see, if they fire everyone from the division, it'll make even more profit. ez
Lianodel@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
Ah, the Jack Welch method.
(Seriously, fuck that guy. He was a pioneer among bloodsucking CEOS.)
MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Honest question: what’s bad about firing the “bad performers”?
caseofthematts@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If they wanted to fire the “bad performers” then they’d be firing the CEOs and higher ranked people, not those actually making the products work.
kibiz0r@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nothing, if that’s genuinely what you’re doing.
But it’s dangerous to incentivize it, because you get short-term gains by firing anyone, whether or not it’s the right long-term call.
It’s also just difficult to identify bad performers. Fundamental attribution error is a bitch. And because we’re really bad at seeing the entire system surrounding someone’s productivity, we tend to blame operator error only to find that the next operator we hire has the exact same problem.
phoneymouse@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There’s no one there left to defend the IP, so they can do evil things. I’m guessing it’s as intended.