Comment on Starbucks told to reopen stores Labor board finds were closed over union organizing
SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 6 months ago
How can they bust unions like that and just getting told to reopen? Let them pay the yearly income of these stores as a fine to the unions fund instead!
CreateProblems@corndog.social 6 months ago
The goal is that they reopen with the same unionized employees, plus back pay. That would be a huge win for the union.
SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 6 months ago
That is not a win in my view. That only means that they have to pay what they had to pay anyway the store were open. That’s like literally no fine. It was worth it for them to try to close the store. At worst they need to reopen the store and continue. What is the backpay of the baristas? 4 worker each 30k/year? That does not hurt them. And you know this because they just did it and will do it again. Where is the fine that hurts so much, that they do not dare to try to bust other locations again and again? The fact that they continue this behavior tells you everything you need to know.
_danny@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Except they were generating zero revenue during the time they were closed. That is pretty close to a fine.
I do also think they should be fined for preventing a union from forming, but having them pay back wages would be more of a fine than most places would be fined because there are basically no penalties for this kind of behavior.
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 months ago
They also are forced to recognize and negotiate with the union under the new NLRB rules, so that’s a win too.