False, there are objectively evil and immoral actions.
Comment on Dumb stance
Steve@communick.news 2 months ago
Claiming morality is objective, requires a moral judgement for one rock falling on another and crushing it.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Steve@communick.news 2 months ago
You didn’t evaluate the morality of the rocks.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Rocks aren’t capable of morality, the only organisms capable of it are humans.
Steve@communick.news 2 months ago
Then it’s not objective. It’s subjective to attributes of whats involved.
_stranger_@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Can “it doesn’t matter” exist on a moral spectrum? I guess if you had an “objective moral framework” that has a tertiary category for “morally neutral” then can it morally judge one rock crushing another as “neutral” / “not my jurisdiction”?
Steve@communick.news 2 months ago
It could be possible.
But what objective moral framework exists? One that doesn’t depend on any observer.
Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Thats quantum philosophy. The duel think experiment. Thinkingergs cat and all that.