Interestingly I whole-heartedly agree with Example 11, “Holding Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the State of Israel”. Didn’t expect to read through that and find any agreeable, although still self serving.

It’s a little narrowly focused, but it does remind me of a better general rule… Geneva comes to mind…

Article 33 - Principle of individual responsibility and prohibitions of collective punishment, intimidation, terrorism, pillage and reprisals.

Maybe they could re-read this example and apply it generally to groups of civilians in the places the IDF invade? Just a thought…

---

Example 8: Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

These are horribly and purposely conflated aren’t they. We’ve gone from speaking of Jewish people, and transitioned to only refering to Israel without specifically being named. All in a telling example trying to smother Israel’s crimes by comparison and deflection.