I’m sure I’m sounding argumentative. You are right and wrong. The colony will refuse to serve the Queen based on her egg production, which can never last forever, supersedure is genetically good for the colony but can result in a short time of stagnation. They can store sperm for a few years, but shit gets stale eventually. Queens are actually born fairly regularly, but are killed in short order. After a few years the one birthing all the eggs experiences senescence.
This is actually a good evolutionary strategy, otherwise it wouldn’t have happened.
(There is no disrespect here, but we need to separate human terms from natural ones. And saying bees are democratic, when they are completely controlled by hormones is a bastardization of that word)
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 week ago
Take a decision like moving house. When bees want to move their hive, they swarm. When other bees notice a swarm starting, they have to make a decision to swarm or not to swarm too. If enough bees to set up a new colony swarm, they’ll pack up and move and set up a new hive. But if they don’t reach critical mass (or if humans intervene and keep the queen at home) they won’t be able to make a new hive, so they stop swarming. In this way, the biggest decision a beehive typically faces looks an awful lot like a political rally in a democracy.
YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 days ago
Concentrations of pheromones explains your question.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 days ago
I find the assumption that if something can be explained, then it cannot be free will or intelligence, to be baffling. My only explanation is that most people think intelligence is magic, and cannot be explained through logic and science. A preposterous proposition, for a psychologist can explain human decision making with the same scientific precision.