If your idea of not scaling up involves a super NATO of thousands of nation states, you should probably go back to the drawing board.
Comment on How would an anarchist society work?
ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 day agoI guess we could just choose not to scale? We could go back to the city state model they had in Europe during middle ages and in antiquity.
The only issue is how you would defend yourself militarily. Case in point: there is a reason why these city states eventually became part of the Roman Empire. A city state versus the Roman empire? It’s not a fair fight at all.
To prevent something like this you would need, like, a super NATO full of thousands of nation states, but corporation at that level maybe difficult (NATO is already proving difficult to maintain as is). You could also have a state for the purpose of only having the military, but that could easily slide into a military dictatorship. So it’s tricky.
Klear@quokk.au 23 hours ago
ageedizzle@piefed.ca 23 hours ago
Yeah, I wasnt trying to present it as feasible
obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 18 hours ago
Military? Who would act militarily against a community? How do you figure slums survive? People could act “militarily” against them. Yet they survive and thrive.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Jokes aside, the cities model worked because that was the scale a society was able to grow to. Transport was very difficult as was communication. And even in the ancient cities there was a power hierarchy with councils of elders and stuff.