Comment on It made it interesting when they started with a name and not a number
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Mine started with ST5, which you had to translate into the number, which was 785. Even as a kid, I knew it was weird. Nobody could ever explain that old tradition of having the letters. Don’t give me a phone number with a combination of letters and numbers, just give me the numbers.
SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 1 day ago
It was a holdover from when you had to make a verbal request to the telephone operator to connect a call, rather than use a dial. Kind of odd that nobody could explain it.
Wikipedia Link
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Did you read the Wikipedia entry you linked? The explanation is incredibly convoluted. No wonder nobody can explain it. I just read it, and I couldn’t explain it to someone. It seems like the reasons were logical when it started, but when I had that number in the 60s, making a call was essentially the same as today (except no push buttons), and there was no reason to keep up with those two letters at the beginning. It was just a holdover from the olden days, like Daylight Savings time. We tend to be reluctant to give up old traditions, no matter how pointless they are.
SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 1 day ago
I found it easy to understand. The last manual exchange in the US was replaced by automatic switching in the 1970’s, so the reason for the letters is still within living memory for some people. I thought that people who’d used the old system would be able to explain the reason for the letters easily.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Valid.