Comment on How possibly?

• paranoid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I’d call it The Machine, and then we could all rage against it

  source

  • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Oh shiiiiiiittttttt bro cracked the code

    source
• defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Capitalism

  source

  • AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Abolition of class is a nice idea, but in the meantime, what would you call patriarchy instead?

    source

    • defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s not about what to call it, because patriarchy has a specific definition and is a real issue, but instead, it’s about realizing that patriarchy is a symptom of a larger issue of class and to point the finger at the correct issue to better organize with like-minded people to ultimately fix the issue at its core.

      source

      • AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        History, from the matriarchies of old to the queens of Ancient Egypt, shows that “rulers” and “patriarchy” aren’t a package deal. Patriarchy isn’t a symptom of hierarchy. It’s a distinct engine of oppression. Abolishing class doesn’t automatically liberate women from the material reality of unpaid household labor.

        We cannot treat gendered or racial division resolving as an inevitable byproduct of a classless society. Cultural superstructures lag behind economic shifts, and these autonomous divisions don’t simply resolve to match a new base.

        Praxis is the refusal to treat the domestic struggle as a secondary theater of the revolution. By naming and engaging the material roots of gender, race, and the “IQ” myth today, we forge solidarity with groups historically kept on the sidelines, unifying the masses for the broader class struggle. We don’t wait for these hierarchies to evaporate. We name them and bring the fight to them.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Joe

  source