Comment on Dumb glasses
lumen@feddit.nl 8 hours agoI don’t like surveillance either, but as it currently stands, you have no expectation of privacy in public.
Comment on Dumb glasses
lumen@feddit.nl 8 hours agoI don’t like surveillance either, but as it currently stands, you have no expectation of privacy in public.
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
I think it would be necessary. And if anyone has a problem with it let them bring legal challenges. In fact, let’s run arguments for and against identity and information harvesting by private citizens against private citizens through the courts and see what shakes out. Seeing as how your position is based on what’s legal as opposed to what’s ethical, I bet you’d be in favor of that.
lumen@feddit.nl 8 hours ago
It’s not strange to want a line drawn somewhere regarding public photography. But I just don’t see how that line ever can be drawn in a fair way.
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
An important distinction that I don’t want to get lost in our discussion is that this isn’t just a camera. It’s a device designed to provide a user with someone’s identity and, by extension, available information about the target without their knowledge or consent. I can instantly think of half a dozen ways that can be used to bring harm to others, some of which meet the legal standards for harassment.
So taking someone’s picture, and using facial recognition to acquire their identity and entire digital footprint for unspecified use by another private citizen, all in secret…line seems awfully clear to me.