lmmarsano@group.lt 1 day ago
Per site bylaws on community mod removal, can you provide an argument for this case addressing the relevant rules directly?
lmmarsano@group.lt 1 day ago
Per site bylaws on community mod removal, can you provide an argument for this case addressing the relevant rules directly?
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
See my linked posts for an exhaustive argument with sourced links and context. If you have any questions please ask.
lmmarsano@group.lt 1 day ago
I saw: still needs a proper argument.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
What part needs to be elaborated?
lmmarsano@group.lt 16 hours ago
An explicit argument consists of citing the relevant rules, stating how they’ve been violated, and providing evidence. It shows you’ve done the bare minimum to show your claim is plausible. This is in everyone’s interest, especially yours as the interested party.
As basic advocacy, an explicit argument should be expected: if you’re unable to articulate a decent argument, then how can you expect others to do so for you? Leaving that guesswork to others may not necessarily work in your favor. Do you really want to leave the best argument to chance & the unreliable charity of others?
Depending on the objectivity & soundness of the argument, it may convince popular support is legitimate, just, and demands action regardless of where admin decision ultimately settles. Not attempting one, however, draws all of it into question.