Comment

Your projection is wild. You have been doing this all week with different people. Its honestly sad. Why you think im mad is beyond me. This shit is hilarious. You just wont shut up and think youve made some grand point and all youve done is make it clear why nobody invites you to parties.

Sorry girls are better shots and you cant handle that. Its just objectively true.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Dasus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
I don’t think you know what the word means, tbh.

You can check my history, dozens of kids there having tantrums exactly like yours, where they can’t talk about what they said earlier in the thread. Start avoiding. Then a little bit of “lol you waste your time writing paragraphs” to let me know how you’re actually disliking this. Again I’m not. :))

I’m getting “tons of enjoyment out of it” or whatever you said a day or two ago.

Sorry girls are better shots and you cant handle that. Its just objectively true.

Sorry, hunny, we’ve been over this. Something you believe but science says isn’t true isn’t “objectively true”, it’s “subjective delusion”, ie religion. (Although organized religion is sort of objective delusion as well.)

I know you don’t even register it when you see science but for the umpteenth time:

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068418/

Pistol and Rifle Performance: Gender and Relative Age Effect Analysis

Conclusions: The main conclusions of the study are: (1) the men’s pistol performance is better than the women’s even though RAE is not associated to the shooting score in any case; (2) men and women performed equally in the general analysis, but their performances were different depending on category and event with no RAE influence.

What’s that sentence?

men’s pistol performance is better

On a scales of 1 to PMS, how annoyed are you…?;>>

source