Comment

Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash

wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

LLMs have stolen works from more than just artists.

ALL of public repositories at a minimum have been used as training, regardless of licence. including licneses that require all dirivitive work be under the same license.

so there’s more than just lutris stollen.

source

Sort:hotnew top

lung@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
So he’s a badass Robinhood pirate that steals code from corporations and gives it to the people?

source
- wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  The fuck you talking about.
  
  Using a tool with billions of dollars behind it robinhood?
  
  How is stealing open source prihcets code regardless of license stealing fr corporation’s?
  
  source
  - lung@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
    
    he’s not anthropic, and doesn’t have billions of dollars
    
    stealing from open source is not stealing, it’s "free as in speech"
    
    the argument above is that these models are allegedly trained “regardless of license” i.e. implying they are trained on non-oss code
    
    source
    wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
    1) he’s using a tool that took billions in funding.
    
    2) that’s not how open source licensing work.
    
    3) no, I’m saying some licneses restrict LLM usage in the form of derivative work must also be licensed under the same license. Using that work as a starting point requires you to also open that portion of code.
    
    side note:
    
    https://www.securityweek.com/github-copilot-chat-flaw-leaked-data-from-private-repositories/
    
    why does AI have access to private code?
    
    source