Comment on Are users who openly parrot literal Nazi talking points allowed here?
lodion@aussie.zone 11 hours agoI fully believe that the user in question is a Nazi. There is no other rational explanation for their behaviour .
There are other explanations, such the one from my comment you replied to. You may not agree with my interpretation, and Seagoon has not posted to clarify the thinking behind their comment. If it becomes clear that a user is a nazi, I’ll take appropriate action, as I have done with previous users.
Any space that allows that user is a Nazi bar.
I disagree with your characterization of Seagoon as a nazi, this is categorically not the case.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 hours ago
You see how that’s a bad thing, right? Surely. If they don’t clarify their stance is anti-genocide in very unmistakeable terms, one must conclude that they are, in fact, a Nazi. Choosing to remain silent should not be allowed to give someone ranting about lebensraum the benefit of the doubt during an active genocide.
lodion@aussie.zone 3 hours ago
See Nath’s comment about us not being the shapers of the community or its discussions. Users are free to reply or ignore as they see fit to other user posts/comments.
As I previously posted, (twice now), that is not my interpretation of the comment on the article you posted. Only if you view the comment in a vaccum could you come to the conclusion you have. It seems you’ve either ignored my interpretation, or don’t understand it.
If I were jewish and posted in support of legislation put in place to protect fellow jews, and someone on the internet leapt to the conclusion I was a nazi because the legislation in question is right leaning… I’d probably do my best to ignore them too. Seagoon doesn’t owe you an explanation for your misunderstanding.
I’m done posting on this topic unless you have something new to say.